chowky 對此事有點迷惘。
大家買iPod 之前不就知道APPLE 獨裁嗎? 還要買都只是自己既決定。
就付錢買另一個software 去破解?
這是ethical problem. 跟本沒有對錯。
Source: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20091011&sec_id=15335&subsec_id=10943028&art_id=13300513
chowky 對此事有點迷惘。
大家買iPod 之前不就知道APPLE 獨裁嗎? 還要買都只是自己既決定。
就付錢買另一個software 去破解?
這是ethical problem. 跟本沒有對錯。
Source: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20091011&sec_id=15335&subsec_id=10943028&art_id=13300513
This entry was posted on October 11, 2009, 4:55 pm and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
3d actionscript Adobe AIR andriod apple app store augmented reality bing blackberry component cs5 css Design download effect Facebook Flash flashlite FLEX flex 3 free game google icon image ipad iPhone jquery Jquery, Mootools linux Mac Magic Mouse Microsoft mootools nokia Opensource Photoshop sdk silverlight twitter UI Window 7 收購 蘋果
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Fusion theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by Ben Li on October 13, 2009 - 12:34 pm
連誠哥都玩,認真吾講得笑~ 肯定’合哂法’啦!
以機價黎講爛水果真係賺到笑, 以商業原則黎講你買機既時候.
你本身已經取得擁有權, 用家想點用就點用. 當然你改機出古惑, 生果吾保你部機就絕對合法合理. 爛水果賣機時無要求你簽’不改機合同’(法理上亦都無可能甘做), 所以真係無咩好講. 最後吃苦既咪又係一班交左陀地又無人’保’既developers.
#2 by Chowky on October 13, 2009 - 6:51 pm
法律上,當然無得去講的呢。
最無奈的都一定是developers 呢。
一則交了錢加入developer program.
二則就花了時間心血來開發。
到頭來得到的可能連本也回不了呢~
developer 無錢,就會另找機會呢,生果少了developer 的支持,就等同食慢性毒藥呢~