<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lab of Chowky &#187; Oracle Database 11g</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lab.chowky.com/tag/oracle-database-11g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lab.chowky.com</link>
	<description>分享ＩＴ技術</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Database 11g VS Microsoft SQL Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://lab.chowky.com/2009/08/oracle-database-11g-vs-microsoft-sql-server-2008/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oracle-database-11g-vs-microsoft-sql-server-2008</link>
		<comments>http://lab.chowky.com/2009/08/oracle-database-11g-vs-microsoft-sql-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chowky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft SQL Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle Database 11g]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lab.chowky.com/?p=1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting study. Save up to $33,520.47 Per Year Per DBA by Using Oracle Database 11g Rather Than Microsoft SQL Server 2008 當你決定要選擇database的時候，可以差考一下這份study，雖然chowky都未試用過。 而且chowky都未看完這份study。（留給DBA看看吧） （oracle放得上去的study，當然是對自己有利。） Source: http://awads.net/wp/2009/07/31/save-up-to-33520-47-per-year-per-dba-by-using-oracle-database-11g-rather-than-microsoft-sql-server-2008/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting study.</p>
<blockquote><p>Save up to $33,520.47 Per Year Per DBA by Using Oracle Database 11g Rather Than Microsoft SQL Server 2008</p></blockquote>
<p>當你決定要選擇database的時候，可以差考一下這份study，雖然chowky都未試用過。</p>
<p>而且chowky都未看完這份<a href="http://www.oracle.com/database/docs/edison-oracle-11g-vs-sql-server-2008-cmcs-whitepaper.pdf">study</a>。（留給DBA看看吧）</p>
<p>（oracle放得上去的study，當然是對自己有利。）</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://awads.net/wp/2009/07/31/save-up-to-33520-47-per-year-per-dba-by-using-oracle-database-11g-rather-than-microsoft-sql-server-2008/">http://awads.net/wp/2009/07/31/save-up-to-33520-47-per-year-per-dba-by-using-oracle-database-11g-rather-than-microsoft-sql-server-2008/</a></p>
 <img src="http://lab.chowky.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1000" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Flab.chowky.com%2F2009%2F08%2Foracle-database-11g-vs-microsoft-sql-server-2008%2F&amp;title=Oracle%20Database%2011g%20VS%20Microsoft%20SQL%20Server%202008" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://lab.chowky.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lab.chowky.com/2009/08/oracle-database-11g-vs-microsoft-sql-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

